What will gun laws change




















With about firearms in circulation for every residents, the U. However, gun ownership is becoming less common across the country. One in 3 U. The Second Amendment of the U. The conservative-leaning court may soon decide whether gun owners can carry guns outside the home. The federal government requires most gun buyers to clear a criminal background check and tightly regulates ownership of machine guns, which are fully automatic, and silencers. Mississippi has the most permissive U.

Buyers do not face waiting periods and the state does not have a red-flag law. University of Iowa criminology professor Mark Berg found that the rates of assault in the U. Firearms were a factor in 39, U.

Suicides account for 6 out of 10 gun deaths. Gun rights are one of the most divisive issues in American politics. Supporters see firearms as an important tool for self-defense, target shooting, and hunting, as well as a powerful symbol of individual rights. High-profile mass shootings have increased public pressure to tighten regulations. One reason: Small, rural states where gun ownership is widespread have disproportionate influence in the U. Senate, where a supermajority of 60 votes is needed to advance most legislation in the seat chamber.

The Democratic-controlled House of Representatives passed legislation expanding background checks last month, but it faces long odds in the Senate, which is split between the two parties.

The political landscape may be changing. The National Rifle Association NRA has been one of the most influential gun rights lobbying groups in Washington for decades, but has been hobbled in recent years by infighting. The group recently filed for bankruptcy in an attempt to stave off a legal challenge in New York. Meanwhile, advocacy groups like Moms Demand Action that back stronger restrictions have stepped up lobbying expenses over the past decade, though they still trail gun-rights groups as a whole.

Already a subscriber? Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in.

We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier.

Notice: JavaScript is not enabled. Please Enable JavaScript Safely. In Depth: Topics A to Z. In general, do you feel that the laws covering the sale of firearms should be made more strict, less strict or kept as they are now? Next, we'd like to know how you feel about the state of the nation in each of the following areas. For each one, please say whether you are -- very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied or very dissatisfied.

If you don't have enough information about a particular subject to rate it, just say so. How about the nation's laws or policies on guns? Asked of those dissatisfied with U. Do you think there should or should not be a law that would ban the possession of handguns, except by the police and other authorized persons? Gun Ownership: in Home or on Property. Do you have a gun anywhere else on your property such as in your garage, barn, shed, or in your car or truck? Do you personally own a gun, or do the gun or guns in your household belong to another household member?

Next, I'm going to read a list of problems facing the country. For each one, please tell me if you personally worry about this problem a great deal, a fair amount, only a little or not at all?

First, how much do you personally worry about the availability of guns? How worried are you that you or someone in your family will become a victim of a mass shooting -- very worried, somewhat worried, not too worried or not worried at all?

Are you for or against a law which would make it illegal to manufacture, sell or possess semi-automatic guns known as assault rifles?

Do you think there should or should not be a ban on the manufacture, possession and sale of semi-automatic guns, known as assault rifles? Thinking about mass shootings that have occurred in the United States in recent years, from what you know or have read, how much do you think each of the following factors is to blame for the shootings -- a great deal, a fair amount, not much or not at all? How about -- Easy access to guns? How about -- Violence in movies, video games and music lyrics?

How about -- The spread of extremist viewpoints on the internet? How about -- Failure of the mental health system to identify individuals who are a danger to others?

How about -- Inflammatory language from prominent politicians or political commentators? How about -- Drug use? How about -- Insufficient security at public buildings including businesses and schools? Christopher Poliquin does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Recent mass shootings at three spas in Atlanta, Georgia and a supermarket in Boulder, Colorado have renewed calls for new gun legislation. The U. Congress has declined to pass significant new gun legislation after dozens of shootings , including shootings that occurred during periods like this one, with Democrats controlling the House of Representatives, Senate and presidency.

This response may seem puzzling given that national opinion polls reveal extensive support for several gun control policies , including expanding background checks and banning assault weapons.

But polls do not determine policy. Stricter gun laws are more popular among Democrats than Republicans , and major new legislation would likely need votes from at least 10 Republican senators. Many of these senators represent constituencies opposed to gun control.

Despite national polls showing majority support for an assault weapons ban , not one of the 30 states with a Republican-controlled legislature has such a policy. The absence of strict control policies in Republican-controlled states shows that senators crossing party lines to support gun control would be out of step with the views of voters whose support they need to win elections. I am a professor of strategy at UCLA and have researched gun policy.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000